Microsoft is losing Builders fast. They’re switching to MacOS and Linux. The biggest pull keeping people on Windows, outside of shear inertia, is content creation and gaming. However, even these are falling to Linux.

Without Builders, you don’t have software, and without software, you don’t have users. This is why Microsoft needs Windows Lite.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you want Windows Lite then you might as well commit to Linux.

    Plenty of YouTube videos on tons of different distros for anyone to find their starter distro that’s similar to Windows.

  • Tixo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    to little, not late. Been a avid windows user since `95, used all of them up to 11 no exception, pivoted 3 years ago to linux, and at this point there is literally not a thing that will bring me back. Linux is 1000x better for me, free of charge, more polished, faster, better looking, no BS, and if there IS any bs, i can move to another distro that i like. There is literally not a single thing. Those kernel level anti cheat games… fuck em, i got 1000’s of games to play that work on steam and gog and uplay and battle.net and all other platforms flawlessly no problem and been waiting to play em.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Microsoft is not going to remove .NET to attract software developers when they want developers to use .NET. Not having access to software that uses .NET probably wouldn’t be a good trade off for how little removing it from Windows would do to make Windows lighter.

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      .NET is arguably one of the better things to come out of Microsoft. The CLR only runs when a .NET application is running so it’s not bloat, and it’s pretty lightweight as far as a VM goes with JIT. It’s well documented, has public standards, is cross platform, and released under MIT.

      I’m a Unix/Linux greybeard so I’ve no real skin in the game. But given how C# has become the defacto cross platform game development language of choice for both Godot and Unity engines, .NET deserves a little credit.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      To quote Steve Ballmer; “DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS […] DEVELOPERS. YES!”.

  • AdamBomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    .NET is just a runtime, not problematic at all, and definitely doesn’t deserve to be lumped in with ads, spyware, and AI.

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Micro$lop wants to become what IBM was. They want corporate money and subscriptions. They hate users anyway.

  • Mereo@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    The author of the blog is living in dreamland. Microsoft will never release Windows Lite because, to management, Windows is a conduit for AI and subscriptions.

    Linux is the answer.

  • hayvan@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not really. Windows can shoot people’s dogs and people would still use it, look for “disable targeting feature debloat” or something.

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    But here’s the big problem: stripping all of the terrible shit out of Windows doesn’t make it better than Linux, it just makes it less bad than Windows is today.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      For anyone running anticheat games Windows is the only option. Windows being utter shit might one day get them to give up these games just so they could ditch Windows. Which I’d welcome, but Microsoft probably doesn’t.

      • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some anticheat games, yeah.

        The vast majority of games, including most multiplayer games (and many with anticheat) work just fine on Linux today thanks to Proton, and even MacOSX is starting to catch up with GameHub.

        For the few games that don’t work right now, I can easily imagine someone filling the gap with a Windows dual boot partition (or even just a PS5).

        I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say that Linux is closer to being what we need it to be today than Windows is. Windows has a lot of work to do, and even then it’ll never be quite as open or computer geek-friendly as Linux. I don’t see a good path forward for Windows, especially as casual users more deeper and deeper into mobile ecosystems.

      • Reality@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or the other way around. As soon as enough people switch, game devs will follow.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Removing .NET wouldn’t be a good idea tho.

    And Microsoft doesn’t care much for gamers on desktops, they’ll mostly cater to the Xbox players that runs a basically slimmed down and locked version of Windows.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s no money to get or data to sell from that though, so it’s not gonna happen.