• UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    so coming from you pleasr tell us what would be the best way to project an as accurate as possible world map? I mena both in 3D version and as a 2D version

    • paraplu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      Pick one that suits your application.

      If you’re not using it to engage in navigation, Equal Earth is a sensible default.

      Tools like Google maps are a bit thornier. They’re used for navigation, but generally not in a way where angles matter. I could see someone getting themselves into trouble because the angles are screwy. But then again if Google cared about that sort of case, we wouldn’t have the recent story of the Gemini hikers.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        yeah, i tried to figure out the angle between two points off google maps the other day. it fucking sucked. i ended up using another website that was basically a frontend for doing it.

        i’m still not sure if it was right. if i go orienteering again, i’m bringing paper maps. precharted routes and angles drawn in so i don’t have to look anything up out in the field. orienteering off your phone is stupid.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That is not really an answer.

        What is the best general world map to teach kids about the world, that we can put in a book or as a poster on the wall, without having to switch to different maps for each lessen, confusing everyone?

        If it is not Mercator, then which one is?

        • paraplu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          For teaching kids Equal Earth is a reasonable choice. Scale and relative global position are conveyed better.

          A side effect of Mercator massively distorting size near the poles, neither Europe nor Canada don’t feel as North as they actually are.

          Kids don’t have much of a reason to care about specific angles.

    • philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      A 3D version would be a globe. A 2D version is inherently inaccurate because it’s 2D and the earth is not. You are free to pick your poison in the manner of your projection but you will always loose something.

      • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        So when it comes to picking a 2D poison which ome would be currently best? The new UN map ? or …

        Or would a better solution for 2D be a ‘collection’ of pictures of the Earth from numerous different angles? And we just look at each of the angles seperately as their own seperate 2D picture of different parts of the Earth? So Im talking we supposedly take 14 or 20 or more different pictures of the Earth from 14 or 20 or more different angles of the Earth then we just lay out each of those pictures and it is up to the viewer to look at each picture of each angles of the Earth and to do what they can in their head with those pictures. Bad idea, good idea?