• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2023

help-circle






  • My understanding is that they published a machine-checkable proof (Lean).

    There’s already valid epistemological question about whether proofs that are only machine-checkable are the same quality of knowledge as traditional proofs. For instance, the 1976 proof of the four-color theorem was controversial in part because it was too long to be read by a human.

    Another part of the argument is that the foundations are quicksand: proof checkers include unverified code (read: potentially buggy) and run atop unverified OS kernels on a likely proprietary CPU! (Personally, I think if you can understand the theorem statement, it’s safe to delegate the drudgery of the proof-checking to a computer. If two different systems agree, that’s good enough for me. But I’m neither a mathematician nor a philosopher.)

    These AI generated proofs push the boundary further because humans participated even less in the formalization and proof development.




  • You know how everyone swears that AI is making them so much more productive? If there’s an ounce of truth to it, I bet that it’s because writing a prompt forces them to articulate what they’re stuck on. I discovered years ago that when I’m stuck on a technical problem, I can usually break through by brain dumping onto a page or two — it doesn’t matter if I ever read it again, it’s just something about the process of writing that helps me make new connections and prune the unhelpful ideas.