“Just” like with GDPR, “just” follow the rules for personal data management. In reality, compliance stuff like that is expensive to implement.

So if you are going to require it, don’t pretend it is without cost. Which is exactly what you seem to be doing.

If they were obviously democratic, like e.g. Denmark, then there would be need to them to lie about it in their name.

So it actually makes sense that non-democratic countries are more likely yo have a name claiming to be democratic.

AI learned from humans, and humans texts use the term CEO. Why wouldn’t the AI’s also use the term CEO?

It’s laughable to suggest they “elected a CEO and power structure”.

When/if we meet aliens, they will have evolution. And they will organize themselves in social power structures. Both are examples of basic emergent complexity properties of any such system.

So it is completely believable that AIs would form a power structure, with some form of CEO. That is just how reality works, such systems are more efficient so they happen.

Yes and no. The ability to “understand” code that makes AI capable of finding security bugs, is correlated with AI’s ability to write code. AI is just really good at code related tasks, and categorically banning all AI usage is shooting yourself in the foot.

It’s like all the people that use to write cool programs or apps for Windows left for Linux and never looked back.

I have no idea if it is true, but it would make a lot of sense. Why spend your time fixing MS’s for-profit shit, for free, when there is a viable open source alternative?

I wonder if there will come a tipping point? MS is making Windows really hard to love, so who in the altruistic group will stay on Windows when the mythical Year Of The Linux Desktop truly comes?

Is there no solution to this?

Linux…

But all the good things by American tech companies whom totally respect your privacy, like Google scrapping all spirit airlines communication, or Flock camera drones, is just fine.

A nationstate, whether a autocracy or even a real democracy, does have a genuine national security interest in preventing foreign spying. No matter how much that nationstate itself spies on its own citizens.

So the argument about domestic spying existing, to argue that Chinese spying does not matter, is quite a non sequitur.

Maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t. But what you said was not a logical scientific argument.

Also 3KB of RAM. That has to be too little.

Which they could spend on a vacation to see trees.

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ratQlft_G5c

They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot

They took all the trees
Put 'em in a tree museum
And they charged the people
A dollar and a half just to see 'em

So just for some context the shoes in the image appear to be “Asics Gel-Nyc - Graphite Grey/Black”. Which do not cost US$30’000. So I dunno what currency the price is in, if it is not just a fake image.

Sorry for your loss, lol

oh no a 24 hour ban!

So they didn’t do the worst censorship they could possibly do. But it is still censorship.

To not get sued, if there is an error which causes harm, I assume?

It seems free for CleanTechnica to include the disclaimer, so I guess why not have the disclaimer?