I have the same answer for most problems in the Fediverse.

  • 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 21st, 2026

help-circle

  • I mean, you are describing modern copyright.

    But copyright is an example of something where the US Constitution, at least, explicitly says its purpose is to “promote” something:

    [the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

    I like how straightforward the Copyright Clause is. It even gives a testable standard. The length of “exclusive Right” for IP should be the “limited” length of time that “promote[s] the Progress of Science and useful Arts.”

    So, the plain reading here is that IP laws need to give exclusivity long enough to encourage creation, by making authors and inventors think it is worth the time and money investment, but not so long that they discourage creation, for example, where a person doesn’t create something because they are afraid of violating IP laws.

    Originally, in the US, copyright lasted 14 years, with an option for renewing for 14 more years, and this is one example where I think they got it about right.




  • Wonderful, thanks for looking that up.

    I remember learning about that bug years after the OS came out, and not being too surprised that it was never fixed.

    Windows 95 crashed so often that you’d basically have to specifically do nothing with the machine to ever get that crash. And even then, you’d just assume that it was crashing like Windows 95 always did anyway.

    So you’d be unlikely to see or recognize that bug unless you were specifically testing for uptime issues.


  • Also note that government NEEDS stability, which Linux very much wasn’t until recently (and arguably still isnt); this is why Windows has starting becoming a liability.

    I was using Linux in the late 90s when my Linux machine would run for months, only being rebooted when I decided to do a kernel upgrade, and meanwhile everybody was running Windows 95, one of the least stable OSes that I’ve ever used. It literally had a counter baked into the OS that caused a crash if you ran it for a certain amount of days, I think 30. If stability was so important, they’d have switched to Linux back then.

    Even in the late 90s, the UI was decent enough as long as you had a decent administrator. I don’t think casual users could be expected to set up Linux back then, but that’s not a government type of use case.


  • Why not Windows 11? Because China, like many other non-US governments, no longer trusts American companies with their software and services. This approach is all about digital sovereignty.

    I never understood why any country would allow their government computers to run proprietary software from a foreign (to them) company.

    I’m sure that China had access to a lot of Windows source code as part of their previous agreement, but it’s far too big a risk, really, for any country, even the United States, to run Windows.

    As far as I’m concerned, China is decades late in making this decision, and it’s still ahead of a lot of (most?) governments.










  • I think this is more of a political meme than mildly interesting, but I will point out that virtually every politician who can become the leader of a developed country has pictures similar to this.

    Pictures like this are always used as gotchas by their opponents. Oh look, they shook hands with a really bad person! Oh look, they are standing next to a silly looking person! Yes, part of their job is to shake hands with people, even bad people. And part of their job is to take pictures with people, even if they look silly.