Well, yeah…profits now is good for me, what comes later is someone else’s problem /s

I mean, we also have a lot of “papers please” in real life that no one has an issue with and actually serves a useful purpose. So the idea of extending this to the internet is logical and not necessarily a bad thing. It can actually provide something good. HOWEVER implemention is absolute key here, because it’s easy to over reach and collect (and store) way more tha! actually required for simple age verification. Since current tendency among politicians (in all nations) unfortunately leans heavily towards over reaching, as usual we can’t have proper things because the douchebags want to ruin it.

That’s connection error

Runs fine for me with jellyfin v12 and findroid on both tablet (LineageOS) and phone (GOS)

does outsourcing who manages it not make you at least a little culpable

What if i have no control over who manages it? I have two, one is government managed and mandatory, the other is part of my salary (and mandatory) and who manages my company paid pension is decided by my employer. I have no control of either aside from general risk profile and high level market groups on my company paid pension (e.g. “tech” or “renewable energy”).

I recently had to install MS authenticator on my work phone, to do so I needed to use the code from MS authenticator. To bypass that I needed to log on to MS to change access option, which wanted the code from MS authenticator to log in.

The regular beeping speaker/piezo solves the same problem without WiFi or other shenanigans.

is the pension fund a company or managed by your state?

Both in my case, as there are both the government pension fund that is mandatory and the one used by my employer which uses one of the large primary pension institutions in my country.

Is it a bit weird that I don’t just manage all my pensions myself? Yes, a bit. But it’s how its done in my country and it has some tax benefits compared to getting the money in hand and investing myself.

Shareholders must be held responsible individually

So, are you personally on the hook here because the company managing your pension fund is holding stocks in LG? Because that technically makes you a shareholder as it was bought with your money, right?

Edit: not sure why I get downvoted, this is a legitimate concern/nuance to the debate. The managing company doesn’t own these stocks so they’re not the shareholders, that’s the people whose money they are managing, but these people are not directly in control of the funds. Who is the liable party in this?

WireGuard still needs a central server that you don’t control.

No, it really doesn’t

Neither has a wireguard tunnel into your home network, you host the WG server on your own computer (or router even, that’s what I do) and just point your clients to that using either static IP if you have it or a DDNS service like the cloudflare you’re using if you have a dynamic IP.

So what, this is just yet another app that makes a VPN connection to your home network, but AI-coded instead? Why not use one of the non-AI made solutions?

It’s not just an issue with incorrect meta data. It will also just flat out refuse to import files if you’re not 100% compliant with what seems like a strict hardcoded folder structure and naming. It will also mess up your manually fetched metadata and any manual adjustments you’ve made if you need to update the library. And don’t even get me started on how it handles chapters in some audiobooks, JFC it can be a shitshow.

I don’t know of a better solution though, so I’m living with it, but it’s a very “hand carried” solution, and were it not for my kids I would rather just have the files directly on my own device with a local player and don’t have the hassle. I wish it would work better like the *arr stack and jellyfin.

I’ve found it really annoying to deal with because it is ridiculously picky about how you structure your audiobooks and name the files. If you don’t get it exactly how it wants it, it fucks up imports.

Like, what part of Mullvad not being responsible for the donation in any way is it that people are not understanding? The company had no control or say over this dudes donation, so they can’t be responsible for it. Sure, don’t buy mullvad so you avoid indirectly giving the nutjob more money to support his fascist political views, that’s a totally valid response. But It doesn’t change that Mullvad is not, and never can be, responsible for his donation.

Yes I fully understand how he gets money from being part owner of the company, I never said that wasn’t the casr. But how he chooses to spend his private cash is not the fault of Mullvad the company.

I completely get wanting to boycott the company to avoid giving him money. But it makes no sense to blame the company for his private spending.

Yes of course he is. but once it leaves the company to pay him his share, Mullvad is not able to control of what that money is spent on whatsoever. Since he made a private decision outside the control or influence of the company, how couod Mullvad be accountable for it?

The guy made a donation with his own money. His donation is no more Mullvads than a donation you make privately is representative of the company you work for.

Yeah sure I’m not arguing it should be culled, just that calling a feature untouched by the vast majority of users beloved is incorrect.

That would just make it 5% of a vast majority, nearing 100%, so still only a small amount of users.

I get what you’re saying, but when something is only used by the small demographic that is “power users”, it is not a beloved feature of the userbase as a whole.