How do you know? What is the mechanism in you?

Let’s take a random moment and define it the birth moment. Let’s take a moment that is precise measured like the first air touching the skin. Or uninterrupted light. Or whatever then we just need to go down to milliseconds and we have a youngest human.

I get this. The weird part is that AI was supposed to make information easier to access, but it has also massively increased the cost of deciding whether information is worth trusting.

Before, I mostly asked: “Is this outdated?” Now I often ask: “Did anyone actually research or experience this, or is it just a plausible-looking summary generated from other summaries?”

What bothers me most isn’t even that AI-generated content can be wrong. Humans have always written garbage. It’s that producing convincing garbage has become essentially free, so the ratio of signal to noise is getting worse.

I don’t think “before 2022 = trustworthy” is a reliable rule either, but I understand why older content can feel more valuable now: at least you know it wasn’t produced by the current wave of generative-AI content farms.

I didn’t read it to but probably mandatory otherwise you can not use the tv

It’s trained by humans

When your friend convinced you to go to church and get molested and there is no God

Pikachu

Besetzt

Who could be behind a hate for Firefox? Did you read it in your Google feed?

That’s not bad as long everyone gets the same share. If you are just the door and get less than it gets to be a problem.