

“If A is true, everything hinges on B” does not imply that everything, independent of A or not, hinges on B.


“If A is true, everything hinges on B” does not imply that everything, independent of A or not, hinges on B.


If you mean wRiggle In Piss in the last panel? Then, sure.
This a typical “grindset” opinion and it is retarded. People deserve to get payed. The the owner class is allowed to undercut some people, who are used to even less, does not justify keeping wages low.


I remember CS 1.2… It’s so crazy.
With this administration the only thing that would happen is that the aforementioned species would be dropped from federal protection.
It’s crazy. I mean even if you are against taxes and everything it is a shared pool of resources. What are we supposed to with it if not pay for these things? Pay for the salaries of politicians that do not utilise these resources?
All the time you hear from these people what the government should not be spending tax payer money on but you rarely hear anything about what the money should be spent on.
Shouldn’t it be “Remembering Harambes privates”?
Are these African countries?
The problem though is that AI reduces the number of places to work at which will increase the competition between applicants. If some employers start doing this there will be applicants that will pay to get ahead. How big of an issue this becomes depends on how big of a competition AI will place on job seekers.