OBJECTION!

He was a great actor, and Bruce Almighty is my favorite ever film

Thinking about how there’s gotta be some dogfucker out there going, “Hell yeah I voted for this!” and how he probably has one of the most coherent and internally consistent reasons for voting Republican out of anyone who did.

That’s Kristi Noem, a Republican who wrote in her autobiography about how she shot her dog after failing to train it and claimed it showed she was capable of doing “dirty, messy, and ugly” things in politics too.

black listed into oblivion

Meanwhile, the one who actually got blacklisted was Macklemore, while Ed Sheeran has a whole tour ahead of him.

If people don’t want to go to his tours because of his shitty behavior, tough shit.

If I choose the Moon landing, do I get to watch it from the Moon? Because that sounds pretty fun.

You’ll also get a lot of that on here, depending on the instance (as you’re seeing).

If doing deeper analysis than good guys and bad guys counts as “enlightened centrism” then all Marxist philosophy is and always has been “enlightened centrism.”

I will never forget how Osama bin Laden went on to host a game show

What’s the difference between a cow and 9/11? You can’t milk a cow for 25 years.

Look, is it a pyramid scheme? Sure, maybe. But trying to pick the right religion to get into heaven, and even then there’s no guarantee, that’s like playing the lottery. You’re better off signing up now and getting a better spot in the pyramid.

Jokes on you, my plan all along was to tempt you away from God to secure a better position in Hell, as is the secret motivation of all atheists. Muahahaha!

There’s a pretty significant difference between blocking the free movement of people between two polities and the question of which polity controls an area. And I say that even as someone who doesn’t care about the second one unless I have a good reason to (beyond just it being a border).

You don’t understand how sources work. Let me break this down for you.

That troops are imperialist killers-for-hire is my conclusion drawn from historical facts. Those historical facts include that they went abroad to occupy a country for decades in a war of aggression that killed hundreds of thousands of people.

If you’re disputing those facts, tell me what you’re disputing and I will happily supply a source for it. If you agree with those facts, then no source is needed. If you agree with those facts but still disagree with my conclusions, then you must disagree with my logic and reasoning, which doesn’t need a source.

If you don’t understand my reasoning, then I’m happy to explain it, but I think it’s pretty straightforward. They are hired to invade countries and kill people, so they are killers-for-hire.

If you understand my reasoning but still disagree with my conclusion, then you can challenge some specific part of said reasoning.

That is how reasoning and debate works. You don’t just point wildly at whatever someone says and demand a source. If you’re asking for a source, it means that you disagree or are uncertain about some specific fact underlying the chain of reasoning that leads to a conclusion.

If you want me to link you a source on a claim, tell me what specific claim. Otherwise I have no idea what information you’re looking for.

What do you think the guns are for, exactly?

You need a source for the claim that murder is wrong?

Links for what info? Do you need a source for the fact that there was decades-long occupation of Afghanistan? Have you been living under a rock?

Murderers deserve punishment. What more is there to explain?