Pansexual because gender and physical looks are mostly irrelevant to what you find sexually attractive

Bisexual because you find both sexes physically attractive making gender mostly irrelevant

I don’t believe you

I agree. Don’t support what you don’t support. That being said, some people are ok with the trade-offs and that’s entirely up to them

I think the point is they can’t upload anything if they’re not connected. Unfortunately, they’re some of the best OLED TVs right now in terms of the display

I can still try

https://www.societyofrenewal.org/manifesto

Just for the handful of games that can’t run on Linux. Other than that, all *nix

I thought the opposite. I think the first one is rn

That’s so long, though!!!

IPTorrents ftw

I think the point is that the pricing is much higher than it ought to be, so to get genuinely better the prices either have to go down or you have to have a very long period of them not going up as much as inflation.

What are good alternatives?

Jokes on them. I was both

This really should be the other way around. It’s the Candy Crush owners/developers getting people addicted to the game saying, “we’re done when I say we’re done.”

Shouldn’t it be “anum”?

Thanks! I’ll be back in a month with my new crow buddy

But how do I get a crow friend?

I’ve had tinnitus as long as I can remember, and it doesn’t bother me at all. I’ve gotten used to it. I mean, I never don’t hear it, so there’s no alternative.

No, it will be the same field of technology. LLMs are just a facet of AI, currently. I’m done having this discussion with you, as you do not have the capability to grasp rational thought or have a rational discussion.

And, no. You started the insults. I responded with a couple.

That’s some pretty absurd logic. It is clear there is no point in continuing this discussion, as you are too easily trapped by logical fallacies and are too quick to jump to insults. Hopefully you can take some time to try to grow as a person.

The field of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence does not depend on the success of Large Language Models, and LLMs quite possibly have reached their limits. I do not see that as relevant.

I am far from dumb. I got 60/60 problems correct on a proctored Raven’s Progressive Matrices as a teenager. That places my pattern recognition much higher than most of the world’s population. I taught myself C++ when I was six years old in 1997.

You’ve created a strawman by recasting my argument to a point that I am not making. I did not say “trust vendor promises” or “ignore current failures.” I said present-state-only evaluation is a bad way to judge emerging technology.

Engineering forecasting is not limited to closed-form physics. It also uses empirical progress, deployment data, cost curves, failure modes, and observed capability gains. Your pig analogy only works if AI had no demonstrated utility and no measurable improvement. That is plainly false.

Criticize cost, energy use, incentives, etc. Those are real arguments. But “some promises are hype, therefore the whole field is slop and cannot improve” is not analysis. It is just cynicism with insults attached.