Going to say no to that, but not because I disagree with the content but because today is a day where getting enough dopamine is difficult. I will however save it and hope it doesn’t get doomboxxed so I can enjoy the content when I’m capable of giving it the attention it deserves.

Ask them if they want to play battle shits?

I respectfully disagree about giving Nazi’s attention.

You should pay attention long enough to them to punch them in the face, or take a bat to their knees. And it’s very important that you pay them attention when aiming a gun at them, as you don’t want to hit innocent bystanders.

Though those are the only exceptions I can think of, everything else you’re spot on about.

Oh I bet. I’m not multi-lingual, unless you count body language :p. Learning English was hard enough as a kid. When I was talking about spoken languages I was refer to random comments online, and sometimes not fully translated games to help get the gist of what’s going on.

For professional work, I prefer to hire an expert.

Sure, but for me its just faster to write it myself, in a way that needs to fit into the project. And while I’m aware you can give this context to an LLM, it still can’t read what your previous intentions were, nor what they are currently. So its hard for it to build on it.

To me they’re best as auto-complete, or research tools in the same vein as StackOverflow. Something to help speed up your existing workflow. Also good at translating both spoken languages, and functions into other coding languages. Everything else seems to get in the way for me.

Yeah I’ve been using LLM’s in Rider for over a decade. I don’t have a problem with LLM’s. I do have a problem with how they’re currently used, and how people keep trying to use them to replace their own thinking.

I think they have a place in the coding scene, a limited niche place, but a place none the less. They just aren’t a replacement for software engineers. Architecture and intention are the big differences to me. An LLM cannot understand intention, it just makes statistical guesses that are often wrong.

If you’re that worried, start working towards killing them. Seems like it’s going to be necessary step either way to correct many problems in the world. What’s one more reason for the pyre?

Unionization is a compromise. Cut out the middlemen(CEO/C-Suite) and make your work employee owned. Socialize the workplace.

I can barely afford to pay attention, now they want 4x as much? Who the fuck can afford 4 * $0 in the current economy?!

Pacifists are selfish, evil, and often hypocritical. I find most modern “pacifists” have no issue with wielding violence, or supporting violence as long as that violence is abstracted to a third party such as the state while constantly deriding people who wish to defend themselves and loved ones from state violence.

Truth is these pacifists would happily see us in camps as long as they get to keep their smug attitudes, and platitudes while avoiding getting their hands directly bloody.

In the end pacifists always implicitly support the status quo.

If our government isn’t up to holding criminals responsible, then it needs to be replaced root to stem.

Of course they don’t care. The government no longer fears the people. The people are little more than livestock to The Epstein Class and their minions.