

I’ve looked at unsealed records provided by the Signal Foundation, and they definitely have the account creation and last accessed date… But besides that, is there really any information authorities can glean from this? Or is it simply the issue that this leaves users at square one, if they’re trying to avoid connecting an identity (be it phone, or Google, which generally requires a phone) to it?
For me, I see this as a potential boon for simply having a second account without having to go through the rigmarole of maintaining an extra SIM card.










I’m trying, but nobody has messaged me yet (see my profile, I’ve had it there for a while!) On the bright side, I guess I’ve enjoyed a lack of spam or other nonsense through sheer obscurity.
Maybe, although I would argue that if the server is a concern already (E2EE makes it one!) then forward secrecy would be necessary to prevent a single key from leaking the group chat in question. And toward secrecy is no longer a new technology thanks to Signal.
I’m hanging onto DeltaChat with the hope they implement it as soon as PGP does.
I’m unfamiliar with the current state of the ecosystem, but… That’s kind of the problem with it too, right? There is no standard, and unlike even Lemmy, the mishmash leads to user-unfriendliness. Specifically I was thinking of this comment , which may not be relevant to your client:
Regarding attracting users, somebody else noted
I definitely don’t want XMPP to fail, but it seems that after years, it’s all too little too late. That one, I’m not holding my breath on. (DeltaChat, I am.)