• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2026

help-circle






  • Everywhere I look in these threads I see accusations of “far-right”, “racist”, “Nazi”, “fascist”, etc, coming from people who seem to me to be in support of equally extremist views such as communism, sexual sterilization of minors, unchecked mass migration, and other objectively destructive social, political and economic views.

    If that’s the kind of people you see all around you, then you’re hanging out in some extremely questionable places that the rest of us aren’t. Where are you hanging out with people who have strong opinions on sexual sterilization of minors or equivalent? What kinds of weird shit are you into?

    Not all of us who work in tech are so thoroughly indoctrinated with far left ideology that we can’t see the reality on the ground in our own homelands and develop an informed opinion on it.

    All of us who work in tech are more than familiar with our weird alt right coworkers who think their constant guzzling of FOX News and OANN type propaganda is “information”. You’re not special, except as gossip fodder.




  • Seems how? They didn’t say anything like that. You think the issue with this guy is because he’s rich and nothing else?

    The funny thing is I’ve seen people saying the exact same thing you are to people laughing at Charlie Kirk getting killed, while doing their best to ignore all the things he stood for, said, and did. Right down to immediately accusing the person of adopting (an incorrect idea of) Nazism by not valuing all lives as precious. Just think about the brainpower behind people who think those laughing at Charlie Kirk are like the Nazis but not Charlie “Civil Rights was a mistake” Kirk.

    There’s gotta be a term for people who get all righteous about treating all lives as precious while they ignore that the person in question actively makes the world worse.





  • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldVideo games
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    No it isn’t, and you can’t name more because there’s no more of the ending of the first game in the second. It’s a couple of flashbacks at the start of the game. And there’s still zero plot or story changes to how the first game ended.

    The video I linked shows the hospital is still dingy and dirty throughout, and you’re coming back with a cropped screenshot.

    If your house is as squeaky clean as that hospital, you’re Asmongold.


  • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldVideo games
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Your idea of a retcon is that the hospital looks different in the sequel game in that tiny cutscene you see? It’s not even true, the hospital is still dirty and dingy. You’re also claiming a character having a wishful opinion is a retcon.

    Neither of these are retcons.

    There’s zero plot or story changes here too to even start making the assertion a retcon happened. How and why are you escalating to accusing the entire TLOU2 of being a fanfic because of two extremely minor things about the previous game, one of which isn’t even true.


  • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldVideo games
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wouldn’t call it “Walking Dead” style. If anything, it wears its Cormac McCarthy influences on its sleeve. If the first game was The Road, the second game is Blood Meridian. The story is intentionally dreary, miserable, uncomfortable, and emotionally draining. Kotaku’s review of the game was pretty on the money for a lot of people, it’s entirely possible to be so put off by the tone and story of the game because it’s so miserable.

    The thing is that you play as Ellie and then as Abby to get both perspectives on the story. The entire message of the game is that revenge and unending conflict a downward spiral of self-destruction. Joel gets done dirty… but so does everyone. That’s the whole point of the game.




  • I’m not playing defense for any particular perspective, I just try to understand all sides and get other people to see different perspectives before forming their own opinions.

    You’re not trying to understand all sides by telling people they should entertain far right, xenophobic, and racist perspectives while doing your best to not acknowledge that that’s what the perspective is. You’re basically trying to shame people into tolerating the intolerant by vaguely gesturing at a blunt virtue.

    Don’t pretend like you’re here trying to convince someone who is against considering a stream of ontology because they prefer a different branch of it. We’re talking about not entertaining DHH’s specific values. If you can’t even admit what those values are when you’re trying to tell people they should respect them, then you must know it’s wrong.

    As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding.

    Principles. Not feelings.

    If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

    Is your argument on this matter your entire character? Because I clearly called your argument cowardly.