There’s nothing about Ubuntu’s proposed use of AI that seems bad at all. Using it to improve accessibility is a good thing, especially when it’s open source, local-only, and sandboxed. I can’t see how having high quality speech-to-text would be a bad decision. Much of that stuff is probably not even considered “AI” by most people.

It’s completely different from a trial jury though. They usually only meet once or twice a week. Sometimes a couple times a month.

Those are all examples of Facebook failing to moderate, not creating content.

You can set up filters in both to do just that.