• 1 Post
  • 11 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 13th, 2024

help-circle
  • An addendum to check out is the arts and crafts movement - it was an explicit counter campaign to the destruction of human skill - it was intentionally destroyed for favor of the factory owning elites.

    We can revive it if we dared to slow down and appreciate inconvinence - if we accepted a human pace of innovation and creation and loved our own local artists and imperfections wed be so much better off.




  • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldDownvoted!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    I think its more that the racist words and racists violence are not two seperate entities that can be tackled independently

    And thats what the person is attempting to do, essentially cut one head off the hydra knowing 2 more will emerge

    The common link is not just the words, its not just the violence, its that and the infinite spectrum of ramnifications of people thinking there are greater and lesser people than themselves

    Yes violent acts are worse than verbal acts Traumas should not be compared, all victems are valid, and words can be used violently.

    But racism is bigger than words and violence, and saying “oh the racist violence is worse than the racist words, so we should be focusing in on the violence” is ignorant, and purposefully looks for a tree so as to not see the forest.

    Racism is born of generational societal systemic levels of suffering - it requires generational societal systemic levels of healing to reduce its harm.






  • This is so frustrating

    The commenter was building on top of your argument

    You said prohibition wasnt healthy

    They said total absence of control wasnt healthy

    They implicitly agreed with you that prohibition wasnt healthy

    I then spell it out for you that the message being built, that almost certainly you also agree with, is that moderation is the answer.


    A counterpoint turns a random point into a line, a line into a polygon, a polygon into a solid, etc.

    That counterpoint gave your message an extra and important dimmension. They thought your message was correct but lacking neccisary nuance.

    For some reason you got peeved with that, and i think that looks poorly on you, not anyone else.



  • Dosent to me at all

    They didnt even really counter your point, they gave another perspective to form a stronger argument of what your message was already saying

    Parents should teach and guide their children moderation, especially for such common and addictive substances like sugar, especially when without moderation serious health and quality of life damages can apply

    If a parents goal is to raise healthy humans with a high quality of life - they should be teaching and guiding children into moderation, not prohibition and the shame that goes with it, not hedonism and the shamelessness that goes with that

    Its not that sugar is some fearful substance that should be prohobited outright, but its also not a substance without issue and should be moderated and controlled if modersation is not yet possible for such a still-developing human

    There are many such substances that need this parental guidance, sugar is just the most obvious one to younh parents - a toddler probably/hopefully isnt hitting a 40 or a roach


  • Death is the end

    Do you judge a book on it last page, paragraph, or its sentence, or its last word, or its last punctuation, or the last page number at the very bottom right?

    I certainly dont, i judge the book for the book it was, in totality (or as much of it as i remember).

    Life is the journey, not the end. The end isnt the point, nor the goal, nor even the destination - its just a point no different than any of the others.

    Release yourself from worrying about one moment, and allow yourself to see the beauty and capability of the entire life