• 0 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 15th, 2024

help-circle



  • They’re describing the idea that the projects that Graphene is built atop and alongside of all use AI. That even if tomorrow it was decided to not allow any AI-generated code, due to the nature of being downstream, avoiding its inclusion in all capacities is actually impossible.

    There is not a hint of peer pressure in this snippet. And if you knew Graphene’s history, you’d realize how absurd of a statement it is to accuse them of being peer pressured. They regularly do random shit and tell critics to get bent.

    With that said, I would of course prefer they don’t accept any AI-generated code at all, but quite frankly it’s a bit bizarre of an ask in 2026 given the game Graphene plays with cutting edge development’s intersection with privacy tools.










  • chloroken@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlBan Windows at schools
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 days ago

    Linux isn’t there yet, not by a long shot, and no education authority worth their salt is going to take the risk of being the first to experiment with their student’s wellbeing, let alone curriculum, for effectively - in their eyes - zero benefit.

    This is the crux of your ramble and it’s nonsense.

    The reason orgs use these tools is productivity, not the well-being of the students. To conflate the two is to admit you’re a lackey of capitalism.

    If the orgs cared about student well-being, they wouldn’t be training them on proprietary systems and letting corpos harvest their data. Period.