I thought this was just a mechanism for Trump to take bribes?

I’m sure there are idiots who tried to play the pump n dump and some MAGAs who deserve whatever comes to them, but I bet a good number of people who “lost money” were insiders recruited to pump the price for political favors.

I’m convinced that to win in today’s market, you really can’t think deeply about anything.

For someone who isn’t well versed in open source licensing, what’s wrong with MIT? What’s a good alternative?

EDIT: Thank you gooeyglob@lemmy.world for answering Q1 in another thread

• Using MIT license to me means the product could (and probably would) turn commercial at any moment if it finds success. Yes these projects are free to start, but there could be a huge cost in terms of migration need down the road, if the developer alters the deal.

Personally, I think the real douchebags are web devs who only build and test for chromium based browsers, making some critical tools completely unusable on Firefox/Linux systems. Looking at you, Chase.com.

Really, anyone who develops third-party software that entrenches monopolies.

Oh wow, a real life infinite money glitch!