flandish

safety is a red herring. capitalism is always going to eschew safety in the name of profit, no matter the industry. there is no difference here with ai. just assume the corps to be unsafe with it.

the problem is actually that the corps want the world to “slow down” so they can catch up; “for safety” is just marketing.

shareholders losing value when another country they did not invest in taking over. you know that “market and invisible hand”

what they are really saying, especially with the “slow down china bad” rhetoric is just temporally advanced from stuff Adam Smith wrote about, long ago: they cannot keep up and are crying to the powers so shareholders are protected

deleted by creator

simple reminder: capitalism will do this, every single chance it gets. this isn’t an ai thing or a sam altman thing, it’s a capitalist thing. since forever.

“change mod”

i tend to call that stuff “ML” (machine learning) instead if AI thanks to the dumbass marketing of today. been working in ML for decades.

just fyi the internet archive storage is most definitely in a data center or 3. your hospitals use data centers, schools too. just not at the scale of ai types.

because capitalists are truly a different species so his peers don’t see him as gay, just as $.

bog standard capitalism, really.

this has been a thing well before “ai” - search for a domain in arin or internic or others back in the day, pass on it, and tomorrow hrm it’s no longer available.

i need a psychoanalyst who can break rule 1 and “mentor” me at the same time, but with no cbt horseshit

again - a huttie or small camp site type thing is not a second home that im talking about. i would not consider that a 2nd home.

a place on the mountains in a vacation town on a culdesac with a hoa that you visit for a month each year is what im talking about. far far diff.

no. “cant really live in” means “needs work to go from 3 seasons to 4.” and then be sold to someone who needs a home.

otherwise it’s a campsite not a “2nd home.”

1. there is zero need to own two homes.

exponentially

no. at 100% mil rate. ie: its value. every year.

if you can’t afford it, then sell it to someone who needs a home. :)

compelled to protect private property

No. I’m compelled, by my own judgment and heart (as what i do is volunteer), to save lives and then protect property.

also, a working class homeowner is not part of the capitalist class. they are part of the exploited class.

a business owner, sure. know what my first priority is? searching for and removing the workers first.

you have some reading to do, buddy. i might suggest “The Jungle” first.

my industry - firefighting and software engineering for healthcare is, particularly quite different than being a part of an organization that has a monopoly on violence. additionally, that same org has me living under capitalism, from birth. so try again with your reductio.

the adults who volunteer to join that violent organization are certainly much more guilty than others who choose not to join.

your attempt at this false equivalency is just trollish and serves to show exactly how much you enjoy the taste of uncle sam’s boot.

hrm. worth a shot. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

the cook is just as guilty as the sniper, yes. i agree.