geekwithsoul

You do understand that people die in ways that don’t involve murder, right?

No one said anything about him being killed. The comment talked about him dying in a comedic way. Not the same thing.

Visual perspective is a new thing for you I guess?

It’s frustrating I know, but I truly think it’s less culture and more just hairless ape brain stuff. Our brains are lazy by evolutionary design and in terms of social communication, it’s sadly more effective to aim straight for the emotional limbic system. We should be creatures capable of sustained rational thought, but… <gestures broadly> that obviously isn’t the case and never has been. It’s all much worse when you’re someone not as prone to emotional appeals, but the trick is to appeal to the emotion and then follow it up with a little bit of the objective reality.

But like calling the Meta glasses “Pervert Glasses” it’s not about being technically accurate in your description of the scope of surveillance, it’s about making it socially unacceptable. It’s why using “weird” worked so well for Waltz - it didn’t provide an all encompassing description of why Trump and his ilk were dangerous and bad for the country, it just nailed how to shine a light on how they’re socially unacceptable (to rational and sane ppl obvs.)

Go slop, stock drops?

or pervPods?

Technically, Epic won, but functionally it didn’t change much. And what they won didn’t help anyone else or the inherent structural issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Google

The best thing about Tim Sweeney is that he consistently has the most wrong take on any issue. He’s like the Lou Gehrig of being an idiot.

Some folks are just very horny.

You’re just not trying hard enough

While Google and Meta provide water usage data for individual facilities, Amazon did not disclose site-specific information.

More than a little skeptical of Amazon’s data, as without facility by facility numbers, it’s impossible to get any sort of sanity check on how accurate their numbers are.

Only politicians can be that arrogant.

Have you never heard C-suite and/or millionaires talk? They all sound like that - that’s what unearned power sounds like.

That’s my personal favorite. It’s flexible to imply both the AI is intellectually masturbating them and also the reverse 🙂

When you say you have it cite its sources, do you actually read the source? Because I’ve noticed models continually cite sources that don’t support what it’s saying.

And it most definitely cannot think/reason/ideate - full stop.

Probably because we have the worst mix of low govt regulations and high amounts of AI tech being pushed at us.

Here, try this - genuine, well-regarded organization with actual experience at opinion polling far in excess of the clanker wankers at Stanford: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/how-people-around-the-world-view-ai/

But many are worried about AI’s effects on daily life. A median of 34% of adults say they are more concerned than excited about the increased use of AI, while 42% are equally concerned and excited. A median of 16% are more excited than concerned.

They lied on the application and said no AI was used.