But cleaning the basket vs cleaning a baking tray?

You can store the heat in oil, but how do you transfer it into cooking oil? It’s not like you can store it directly in cooking oil since it breaks down with heat.

Plenty of memory addresses to go around with 64gb of RAM. Take your pick.

Doesn’t the power of unions come from the employer’s need for human workers? If they don’t need human workers anymore, then what good would a union do?

I’m beginning to think the entire tax system was designed by a committee of people who were locked in a room with a calculator and told to make everything as unnecessarily complicated as humanly possible.

There’s a good chance that they chose the simplest method where “simple” means the easiest to understand change set, not the easiest to understand overall system. People usually have an easier time understanding small changes.

Is she not wearing makeup on both photos? The left is obvious because no one has a face like that, but on the right, that skin tone looks way too uniform to be anyone’s natural skin.

If that debt is accruing interest, it might be a good idea to do that to get out of debt while you still can. The deeper you go, the harder it is to get out. That’ll let you help your friends in the future without as much of a negative impact on your own situation.

That’s the point of having savings. You could just as easily ask yourself what you would do if you spent 2k on car repairs and suddenly your friend urgently needs financial assistance the next day. If you need to spend that money, then you spend it. If you can’t, then you deal with the consequences.

Literally impossible. How could it produce heat without a LLM?

I don’t know. You brought up all those other scenarios. I don’t know how they’re relevant either.

Anyway, why would it not be a good thing if others want to put their lives on the line so that you can live your life in peace, or flee successfully if it comes to that?

I don’t know enough about these situations to comment on them. In isolation, a non-zero amount of suffering and death is obviously worse than none. But the world isn’t an isolated bubble like that. When you consider everything in its totality, it’s no longer so obvious what the correct objective should be, and that’s with the assumption that we can even even devise a measurable score for any of these objectives. Do we care for a lower bound on everyone’s quality of life? Do we want to maximize some quality of life average or total? Do we want to maximize the duration of human existence? Who is this “everyone”? Everyone alive today? Everyone who will ever exist? Do we give the same weight to every person? Or should we use some discounted weighting so that present humans get higher priority than future humans? Or should we put a cap on how much of our collective resources we can allocate to any given individual?

There’s a big difference between inviting someone into your home and someone entering uninvited. There’s also a big difference between inviting one person into your home versus ten people.

So if your land gets taken over, you’ll go somewhere else and take someone else’s land?

Exactly! You don’t. Your comment seems to imply that they are either getting disproportionately high income from reselling premium steaks (i.e. “not feeding world hunger” = only one person benefits from a large sum of money), or that that the income is very low (i.e. “not feeding world hunger” = you’re not making enough money to feed yourself), but the latter doesn’t make sense because any positive non-zero amount of money will get you more food than zero money. I don’t know if I’m missing another interpretation.

I’ve been experimenting a bit with adding LLMs into my workflow, and even when using it constantly for a full 8h workday, it barely uses any of my quota. I’m guessing that those who burn through an excessive number of tokens are probably just letting a bunch of them run unattended and automatically allowing everything. There’s just no way to verify that much of its output.

Very likely. Everyone I know who’s in a software development role is required to use these tools now.

100% of Americans (rounded to the nearest 1%) participate in capitalism. How many of those actually support the system?

Why did we have to bring ethnicity into this? Implying that people of certain ethnicities do not need to eat?

How much can someone reasonably make from doing this? I feel like it would still end up being around minimum wage, if not under.

Of course. That’s a separate problem. I’m just commenting on the part where you say that they should give you the prompt.

Sticking with your analogy, it’s like if you commissioned someone to paint something specific, then decided that you liked the result and wanted to share it with your friends, so you give your friend the instructions you gave to the painter instead of the painting itself.