• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • Wikipedians are terrifyingly fast at getting out some updates. If someone dies, their article moves to the past tense often within 10 minutes of their death being known, assuming they were at all prominent.

    You should always be a bit skeptical, sometimes really arcane subjects’ articles are written by one of the handful of people who understand them, sometimes they’re very subtly wrong but not prominent enough to get the right attention. If something seems off, Wikipedia has tools like the Talk page, and looking at Edit history, that can allow you to glean information in-platform about what might be happening. Edit wars, vandalism, disagreements among editors, maybe a negotiated agreement about a way to represent something controversial, all can become clearer by looking at those resources. You can also check its sources, to see if they agree with what felt off to you, or if there isn’t a good source on that claim.

    It’s not perfect, any system can fail, but at least it has reasonable tools to figure out why it says what it says, and dig further.




  • nfh@lemmy.worldtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t let LLMs take your em dashes; flattening your language to the lowest common denominator to avoid doing anything too distinctive less you be accused of non-authorship… that’s a real harm to you and your reader. If you know how to use them, and enjoy using them, use them fearlessly.