If it’s something I know I subscribed to, I’ll unsubscribe once, then immediately setup a filter to automatically mark anything new coming from that sender as spam.
If it’s something I didn’t subscribe to, I just skip straight to the filter.
All true and well said, but if we’re talking about some small one person or family operation with a limited budget, I’ll take a snapshot from their phone over AI slop every time.
You presumably make the food nearly every day.
I would imagine you probably have a phone with a built in camera.
.
.
.
Do I have to spell it out?
I don’t want them to be required to tell me why they’re overcharging! I want them to be required to not overcharge!
Yes, and that paragraph completely contradicts an earlier one.
It might not look like it, but the person on the other side has the same tools you do. If they wanted the generic answer, they’d have it in a couple of seconds.
They’re not asking you because they want you to “polish the text” from AI. They could also do that themselves.
Using AI to automate tasks that could be automated with a script is awful. And if the endpoints are there for AI to trigger actions, then a simple script could use those same endpoints to do the same thing.
Using AI to help write the script? (Strong emphasis on “help”) Ok, maybe in some scenarios.
But just constantly running AI to do shit is like firing up your big diesel pickup to go down the block to visit your neighbors, except in this case the diesel truck can’t even be trusted to reliably take you to your neighbors every time you want to go there. There’s always the chance it’s going to decide to go somewhere else.
Resproxies are not inherently illegal. Some are used for evading censorship by routing internet traffic through ordinary looking residential homes. AI companies, for example, increasingly rely on resproxies to scrape data from multiple places on the internet in one go to train their AI models.
I “love” how that paragraph tries to paint AI companies use of hijacked residential TV’s to avoid being detected as they scrape the web for training data to steal as some kind of legitimate use of hijacked TV’s.
Pro tip to Zack Whittaker, the Techcrunch author: There is NO legitimate use of someone else’s Internet connection without their knowledge and consent. Full stop.
It will always make one up. Sometimes it may get lucky and the made up one exists and is relevant, but it still just made it up.
And shut-in, no-tipping undergrads from coast to coast weep.
Are you expected to tip the fucking robot?
The people whom you’re posing the question to (other Lemmy users) aren’t in any position to answer the question, and you (should) know that. Therefore, your “question” wasn’t asked in good faith and was instead merely a rhetorical tool used to “present false or distorted claims by framing them as questions.”
Yes, this tactic is often used by conspiracy theorists, but they don’t have a monopoly on it, as you so clearly demonstrated.
I don’t, which is why I posted my comment as a question.
OP apparently wasn’t paying attention to what they were typing when they originally posted. They have now corrected it.
The tide comes in. The tide goes out.
the fact they still don’t have lidar today is criminal.
That would require the muskrat to experience a moment of self reflection and admit he was wrong about something.
But in reality he is definitely planning on filing this in a local small claims court.
Which is arguably better, because it demonstrates to other people how they too can fight back.
“We started noticing consumers weren’t rewarding polish the way brands thought they were,” said Chookie founder Zev Ziegler
Ummmmm…
One of its AI ads was rife with misspellings and terrifying, googly-eyed chocolate bars. Another of them shows an AI-generated figure producing the cookie bars in what appears to be lab.
I don’t think “polish” means what you think it means, Zev.
Duplicate post