You forgot extermination of the poor (i.e., all workers) using the control apparatus being constructed, which actually still could leave a society.
- 0 Posts
- 25 Comments
Sorry to say but that’s kind of a shit conspiracy theory. I’d say it’s more likely that billionaires just want to replace the entire working population with robots and AI. They don’t need to sell anything to anyone, if their needs are provided by their electric slaves.
I would rather make a billion phonecalls than clean my apartment ever
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•World's largest open library calls for volunteers to scan and preserve physical books as AI companies buy, scan, and destroy them — Anna's Archive says ‘time is running out’ as ‘knowledge is permanentEnglish
1·22 days agoLibraries quite often have book scanners.
It’s difficult to put my thoughts on this into words but you’ve captured a good amount of it.
There is incredible potential to this, but the costs and risks it puts us up against are truly horrific. I don’t think I could have ever guessed that we were going to undo all of the decarbonisation effort, which took years, to power these fucking datacentres. I see the benefit in tasks it can already do, just a few short years in, and I wonder how fucked our economies are going to be when every office worker is made redundant. No government knows how to deal with any aspect of this, and it’s moving so fast that we’re going to be waist deep before the average person even begins to comprehend the scale of what we are facing.
The models, both open and closed source, are definitely still improving. I guarantee you aren’t getting better results from a 2 year old model than a current one.
The datacentres are needed because
-
the so-called frontier labs have one trick, and it’s bruteforcing through the problem with excess compute.
-
they are in an arms race where success is measured by how many datacentres you have built.
I think that they are going to end up very disappointed when it turns out that it isn’t a technology that can be walled off for profit, it’s basically just going to be a commodity like email.
-
Ok sorry but that’s kind of hilarious
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•When the lunacy of the absurd job application finally puts you over the edge
2·24 days agoNo, its not. I also hire and we take the time to look through the CVs of relevant candidates. If I call someone in I will have questions about their CV for the interview.
Where the lottery actually exists is whether you are the same type of person as the interviewer, because that has more of an influence on whether you get hired.
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•You should not listen to AI when you know nothing about laptop hardware
42·2 months agoI’ve had pretty good success with Claude doing this even two years ago.
I have an extremely dodgy home server where I needed to move the OS from the eMMC to an SSD connected to the WiFi card port. Obviously had a lot of problems with partitions and cloning but it got there in the end.
There are a lot of surnames like that in English. Westfield, Norwood, Whitmore, Blackwell, etc.
In Danish you get some very precise locations of farms relative to villages and see names like Nordestgaard (North East Farm), Højgaard (high farm, i.e., on a hill), Bjerregaard (mountain farm)
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•ChatGPT's market share slips below 50% for first timeEnglish
28·3 months agoAs is everyone?
If a human can be horny or sad, so can a computer one day.
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•Anthropic Urges Global Pause in AI Development, Flags 'Self-Improvement' RiskEnglish
2·3 months agoWhen I spoke about European countries under socialism I meant East Germany (Stasi), USSR (KGB), Czechoslovakia (StB), Hungary (AVH), etc.
None of these countries were capitalist at the time and maintained gigantic security services to spy on the entire population.
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•Anthropic Urges Global Pause in AI Development, Flags 'Self-Improvement' RiskEnglish
2·3 months agoDo you not think that a hypothetical state without Capitalism could also generate an automated surveillance state? It feels to me to be less tied to the market system and more to authoritarianism. I would simply point to the fact that many European nations under socialism did have very strong secret police spying on the public under the pretext of protection from counter-revolution, which is not really any different to the countries under capitalism today, minus the technology.
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•Anthropic Urges Global Pause in AI Development, Flags 'Self-Improvement' RiskEnglish
7·3 months agoNeeds to be that everyone agrees at once, otherwise the Palantirs of the world will keep going.
Yeah just like how it isn’t a chickens farmer
To: Dear HR
HR response: inline with sent email
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•Mystery company accidentally blew $500 million on Claude in a single month — failed to put usage limit on licenses for employeesEnglish
5·4 months agoAnthropic is projecting a half a billion dollars profit this quarter
paranoia@feddit.dkto
Technology@lemmy.world•99% of CEOs Expect AI-Driven Layoffs in the Next Two YearsEnglish
1·4 months agoAI is getting cheaper every year and the output is becoming better. Look at token prices. The so called frontier models are not that far ahead of the open source models that you or I can run essentially for free, either.
The reality is that you can sit down and automate significant tasks with AI in an afternoon, today. I work in an industry where a significant amount of time is spent auditing and QAing output. A properly trained skill for Claude is able to do the same QA task to 90% of my (senior) level in 2% of the time. Similarly, it is able to coach the junior staff to produce work that is a much higher level than would be otherwise expected of them, reducing the actual audit length on that side too.
I am hugely positive for the future of AI. I am hugely negative about what it means for people.


I actually don’t think that would be an issue, considering the rich are already into eugenics via IVF.