Peacepath

Avoid it! Sport is very bad for health…

no, you need to make the AI drink enough wine so it doesn’t hallucinate ; and it is a truth know since antiquity: if you drawn the datacenters electronic components into wine, there are no more AI hallucination… try it!

Old latin wise people used to say “in vino veritas”, the truth is in the wine… and so it is likely to harm crypto and security… if we accept mythology as a reliable source…

Wine is to be drank, not to pour on your computer!

Am I the only one reading it as an “emergency to give public money from taxes to some friends owning private tech companies”?

I don’t know why I have no fear the chinese communist party would abandon all its power to an AI (neither).

Don’t worry, it can’t become true…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_labor_in_the_United_States

workers at the charge of public expenses, working for the benefits of private companies 😍

War on drugs do not aim at reducing drug trasfic nor drug use. We all know it has never been effective anywhere for any drug.

We also know that treating drug as a medical problem is the best way to reduce both use and traffic.

War on drugs are just a way to force dealers to become more professional, and avoid “freelance” ones. War on drugs are a pure win for drugs, from their start.

It is not an ambiguity, it is a remaining from a popular way to count. Just as you may count per hundreds and 4 100 sounds like 400, and means it. But you may also count things by dozen (most likely for eggs…).

Yet you may use “octante” (beligum) or “huitante” (swiss) instead of “quatre-vingt”.

You may trust a part of them without trusting them all.

Also, you may want to hide things to those you trust ; not only for your comfort, but sometimes to do not hurt them in a way that would be too hard for them at a random time.

And finally, you may want to hide some things from your boss and coworkers. They are close to you in your life, but not needingly your close friends.

If 90% of people don’t have a job, the state has to provide them an income. With that income, they can still consume. Public spending for private profits, as usual.

Of course the system isn’t sustainable, but it wasn’t before AI either.

I would love to find good ideas for protecting digital freedom, and freedom in general. May we can assume that those who do not care about privacy aren’t using Lemmy… But I don’t know how to protect ours except by defending it as a principle that should be universal.

And so a rule to restrict freedom except for us is not a good news to me. It is not as bad as if we were concerned directly, but it is still a step backward. Isn’t it?

easy way to solve all problems (while not resolving any)

At some point they may need a new target, and we could be one. We are known by the general public while we are neither too much nor too powerful. And nobody would defend us beside those already targeted.

I know it is not the aim, I am concerned by how it may be used against free softwares… once more, I hope I am wrong.

Also, I am concerned by the loss of freedom involved by this policy. And I don’t think it is made to protect any one, just to restrict and control.

Can you guess why some want to live near there work and their kids’ school rather than in the middle of nowhere?

USA murdered anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti far before they became a significant threat to the system. What ever tries to bring freedom is so scared by american authorities… But once more, hopefully you are right and I am just overly pessimistic.

The one-true-and-perfectly-good has tried to genocide all form of life by drawning them under rain (fishes got very affraid)… but so yes, you won’t get in his club without at least trying to be a bit as him…

I hope you are right.

Yet do you know if the thing implemented by California would allow criminals to make sure that a kid is really a kid before they attack? Because if that is the case, and even if it needs a hack to do so, it may do the opposit of its aim.

So if you want to protect your kids from adult rated content, and you live in California, you need to buy a propietary system. Which make sure data collectors get to know all about them, and therefore doesn’t protect them… But am I the only one to see the commercial argument about to be used by MS, Apple, and others?