he he, no they won’t. But we won’t expect to see any kind of open source contributions from canonical anymore.

I guess we will see when closed source variants start getting made.

windows forum instantly announces it’s sloppy, confusing rebuttal. Microsoft 365 on Linux: Why the Bottles Claim Needs Caution

This is awesome, thanks!

Thanks that does alleviate my concerns, I do like the name Plutonium or Plutonium-os.

This is very cool! I like the idea of atomic distros although I haven’t really gotten into them much, if you keep on working on this project I might join it.

Question: I’m a bit confused about the package management system you talked about. Flatpaks for user level packages? What about the official arch repo and the AUR? I know other atomic distro’s don’t really work with traditional package managers, what does this mean for Pu-239? If there’s no AUR then there is no Arch Linux at least for me.

Also that name could probably do with some work lol. Maybe work on a shorthand way of spelling it and a better way to pronounce it? I’m not sure.

This is why we should call it “bleeding edge” rather than “unstable” it’s a much more accurate name and it exemplifies the advantages (albeit leaving out the (minor) disadvantages)

I will wait to see if it actually comes at the detriment of the program.

I like the idea. My only gripe is it’s complexity for the average user. If there was a way to make it super simple. Torrent clients and trackers are way to complecated the average user.

I think we should be looking for decentralised alternatives not something prone to enshittification.

WARNING they may suffer from less bugs, less annoying updates, better performance, less spyware and functional package management.

Before anyone says anything I am aware there are trade-offs due to switching from what you know.

Just because AI was used in the development process doesn’t mean it is bad. Doesn’t mean it’s good either but you can’t just ignore it because AI had something to do with the process. Things being made by humans doesn’t make it good either people can write really bad code.

I suppose so, but in that case either red or yellow is a primary colour not both. And since we are viewing this on an addative screen red is the primary colour.

Yellow isn’t a primary colour.

Why don’t you think the MIT license is bad?

Headscale is great but requires port forwarding which, aside from having its own iasues, is something op wants to avoid.

Cheap domains are basically free though so it doesn’t count!

This is what I was most excited for. There is just one vague mention of it in the KDE changelog and it still says “coming soon” on the plasma Bigscreen website I think they just need a bit more time to polish it up and make some documentation.

Nah I’ll keep my 100 mb and ego thank you very much!

it is bloat. also were is your package for (insert any very obscure program). I guess your going to have to rely on appimages or building from source for this one!