The Mitch representation is biblically accurate.

At last some good use case for AI.

Yes I did ask it to please please stay inside. No I didn’t lock the door, why do you ask?

Goes to prove there’s no such thing as a hard to find item.

Public nuisance? Is that a real legal term? What century is this?

Must’ve forgotten to add “make no mistakes” to agents.md.

I think that the training of small models is relatively ethical, given the modest scale. Even more, if they use open datasets.

Do you know of any models matching these criteria? My understanding is that the cheap-to-produce/open-weight models are either just not good or have been trained on output from ChatGPT and Claude, neither of which sounds like a practical alternative to Big Tech.

I’m with you, but sadly I think you should ask yourself the question of how much the businesses care about these points. Not how much they should care, but how much they do actually care. For me as a developer that’s what matters the most, because I cannot maintain my abstinent approach for much longer in the current climate, something needs to happen and tip the balance.

I think any other purpose is hammer looking for a nail

I would agree with this last year, but as a programmer I think the models have become fairly capable in coding. Still not using it myself out of principle and not saying it’s a silver bullet either, but as a striking example I’ve seen how my employer’s marketing team have developed a new version of our public website (not the much more complex main platform, but not a simple landing page either) with Lovable from the ground up. My main hope these days is the current cost structure proving unsustainable for the AI companies to keep up and this becoming their demise in the end (see Ed Zitron), and not much consumers dismissing it as not good enough anymore. I guess that explains why I’m more to the right of that chart compared to you.

Here’s what I got:

1 guy 1 cup

I wonder if they made alternate versions of this. For example with 2 girls.

Sadly I’m pretty hopeless when it comes to individual action because of the insane amount of money involved. I had lost all hope earlier this year, but now there are more and more articles talking about how the math doesn’t math for these companies’ financials, so I’m now sonewhat hopeful that this would eventually put an end to all this.

This is rather investment, so instead of a payback guarantee it has profit share, which will most likely materialize with the IPO. That is not saying that OpenAI becomes profitable, but rather the investors sell their shares at a higher price than their original investment.

Now OP is gonna ask why you hate rapists.

Dunno, some write their emails using ChatGPT and still have “think before printing this” in their signatures.

Well said. I can share it with exactly zero people around me though as that would destroy the relationship.

At the core they both consist of a bunch of rocks.

Check out my post about Uruky which doesn’t have AI features for the time being. It’s far from mature though so might not be suitable as a daily driver. I’m still evaluating it myself.

That’s not even a thing lol