

I think it’s the other way around. They said we need to slow down AI so this story is now being told


I think it’s the other way around. They said we need to slow down AI so this story is now being told


I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.


I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.
the actions of this system cannot be predicted by anyone.
Reminds me of TempleOS where the author thought a random number generator sends messages from god. It was fun when it’s just one person experiencing psychosis in a non-violent way. But the mass AI psychosis is the opposite of fun.


And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?


Sure, but that too is self-defeating and temporary. China will out innovate while we drain our brains and pocket books


What a fucking dipshit. Your valuation is based on “AI” being a commodity without the benefit of having a natural monopoly like with utilities. They don’t even understand capitalism for fuck sake


Being critAI is being proAI.


Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn
At least that hole wouldn’t spew lies
Milo got in trouble for criticising Isreal. Maybe if he sucked off Trump like Loomer did he might still be on this side of the pond.


It’s what follows the signifiers that’s the tell


Yes, using the word “capitalism” is a signifier, but I wouldn’t say it’s counterproductive. Based on a person’s response you can quickly conclude whether they have the historical context to understand the critique. Defining capitalism as “a market-based” system is ahistorical , markets existed before capitalism. It is very hard to surface the critique while also writing a wall of text that describes how capitalism came to be and how it was later moderated


The issue is the term is meaningless if it isn’t grounded in history. If it simply means “the system you live in” then it says nothing of how it came to be and what can come after.


And if we had universal healthcare it would actually be cheaper to produce those cars. Canada is proof of this.


You could say the same of history if you know nothing about it
I don’t know how, but that seems worse.
Brb, asking my cai if it can justify para social violence as well
deleted by creator