When the robot does it, it’s not illegal
The robot is just an extension of the ultra wealthy so of course it’s not illegal
So it’s Bender from Futurama lol.
“It’s impact on society will be on the same level as the invention of the atomic bomb!” (actual comparison made by some big tech CEO)
“Oh my god, so it will be very well regulated and operated with the utmost care?”
“Actually no, not at all.”
The amount of missing nuclear bombs is relevant here i think lol
Relevant because they exist in spite of strict regulation. More reason AI should be regulated.
Wait what?
Okay, but think of all the employees we can fire thanks to it?
Worse as AI are the corps which develope and use it
Ludd was right
You people are going to stop the Plagarized Information Stochastic Stupidity based operation paperclip machine just because it also makes kiddie porn on demand sometimes and starts cults and basically ruined public education and search and the concept of truth like you’re not even grateful for how they make all those mentally ill and old useless eaters kill themselves you irrational Luddite fanatics disgust me I bet you prefer kiddie porn made with individual live children rather than aggregate samples of millions of exploited children so its like you’re masturbating to all the abused kids at once you simple regressive fucks make me sick
Very human of it.
Yet another Pizzacake strawman, yawn.
Do you ppl come to an anti-AI community intentionally just to bitch and defend that corporate theft machine?
So, I did a quick search on where AI has caused a fire because I genuinely want to know what kind of idiot would put an AIAgent in charge of that but couldn’t find anything other than authorities really, really wanting it in charge of predicting fires.
Can anyone enlighten me as to what incident the comic is referring to?
Some company did a probably clickbait bullshit “experiment” with llms controlling characters in a game world and Grok burned down a lot of buildings.
It starts fires?
Pizzacake’s subtle yet brilliant take on AI is bad really adds something to the discussion, I feel.
This subtle yet pedestrian take on Pizzacake is bad really adds something to the discussion, I feel.
I guess I’m OOTL. Why should we hate Pizzacake?
You can google it but the summary is that she handles criticism pretty poorly. Also, her jokes are mostly not even a joke. Most of them are straw man clickbait.
handles criticism poorly
What a pearl-clutching take. Also known as:
After I attacked her, she reacted in a way that hurt my feelings
Maybe, just maybe, don’t attack a comic?
I mean from what I understand she DID handle things poorly. The issue is it happened one time and people will not let it go when there’s no reason to cling to it.
Ah, a straw man argument. Now where have I seen this type of rhetoric? XD
I have never “attacked” or said anything to pizzacake, and she did react pretty poorly when other people did. If you don´t believe me, google it yourself.
That’s… not a straw man argument. Here’s a convenient definition to help you out.
My theory is that you wouldn’t know how she reacts, whether poorly or otherwise, without her first being attacked.
Maybe, just maybe, people shouldn’t attack the person just because they are snowflake about the content of their comic.
Except that it is? You literally added a quote of something neither I nor anyone else said (“After I attacked her, she reacted in a way that hurt my feelings”) and then provided your own reply for it justifying her response. One her real reactions, btw, was portraying her “attackers” as rapists. You did not quote any “attacks” nor her response, but justified it nonetheless because people were “attacking” her.
Criticize != Attack
As a refresher, here’s what a straw man argument is:
A straw man argument (or straw man fallacy) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone distorts or exaggerates an opponent’s actual position, and then refutes that fake, weaker version of the argument instead of the real one.
If you don’t see how your reply fits that definition, I’m afraid I can’t help you.
It’s fashionable among chuds to be offended by her, because she attacked the chuds.
I had enough of stans protecting her obviously low-effort cut-and-paste comics with “tHeY hAtE hEr bEcaUse shE FemNisT”.
We hate shovelware.
Mate, I ignore shovelware. You know how many of this site’s dumb “but whyyy isn’t linux more popularrr” posts I just scroll past?
Agreed. Low-effort comics made popular because she buys upvotes.
She buys upvotes? Shit, where do I get my cut!?
It shows up fine for me, but the op linked the source directly. Adding it again here because some apps get weird with links in picture posts.
What client are you using. It’s crystal clear for me
Pizzacake = Twatwaffle
Why is everyone hate rthis person
